Reformas del estado democrático: subsidiariedad y visión del gobierno limitado

Contenido principal del artículo

Augusto Zimmermann

Resumen

RESUMEN
Aunque sus raíces se remontan a la filosofía política de Aristóteles, la interpretación teológica de Tomás de Aquino de la filo-sofía política de Aristóteles resultó ser el catalizador para el nacimien-to del principio de subsidiariedad que con el tiempo, se convertiría en un aspecto clave del pensamiento social católico romano. A pesar de las similitudes con la enseñanza calvinista y su conocido concep-to de “soberanía de la esfera” como principio del pensamiento social católico, la subsidiariedad se introdujo por primera vez en la encíclica Rerum Novarum (1891) y se enunció en encíclicas posteriores como Quadragesimo Anno (1931) y Mater et Magistra (1961).


ABSTRACT
While its roots can be traced as far back as Aristotle’s political philosophy, Thomas Aquinas’s theological interpretation of Aristotle’s political philosophy proved to be the catalyst for the birth of the principle of subsidiarity, which would in time become a key aspect of Roman Catholic social thought. Despite similarities with Calvinist teaching and its well-known concept of “sphere sovereignty” as a principle of Catholic social thought, subsidiarity was first introduced in the encyclical Rerum Novarum (1891) and was enunciated in subsequent encyclicals such as Quadragesimo Anno (1931) and Mater et Magistra (1961).


KEYWORDS: Democratic, government, rights and political, social tought, principals.


JEL CODE / CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: J11, R48

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Zimmermann, A. (2017). Reformas del estado democrático: subsidiariedad y visión del gobierno limitado. Revista De La Facultad De Jurisprudencia., 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26807/rfj.v1i1.15
Sección
Artículo original (miscelánea)

Citas

Lael Daniel Weinberger, í¢€ËœThe Relationship Between Sphere Sovereignty and Subsidiarity,í¢€â„¢ in Michelle Evans and Augusto Zimmermann, Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity (Dordrecht: Springer, 2014) 115.

Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno: Reconstructing the Social Order and Perfecting it Conformably to the Precepts of the Gospel in Commemoration of the Fortieth Anniversary of the Encyclical í¢€ËœRerum Novarumí¢€â„¢ (Australian Catholic Truth Society, 1931) 25.

Robert K. Vischer, í¢€ËœSubsidiarity as a Principle of Governance: Beyond Devolutioní¢€â„¢ (2001) 35 Indiana Law Review 103, 107í¢€"108, cited in Peter Widulski, í¢€ËœBakke, Grutter, and the Principle of Subsidiarityí¢€â„¢ (2005) 32 Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 847, 847.

Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. London: Burns & Oates, 2005, 94.

Anne Twomey, í¢€ËœReforming Australiaí¢€â„¢s Federal Systemí¢€â„¢ (2008) 36 Federal Law Review 57, 59.

Robert Sirico, í¢€ËœSubsidiarity and the Reform of the Welfare of the Nation Stateí¢€â„¢, in Michelle Evans and Augusto Zimmermann, Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity (Dordrecht: Springer, 2014) 123.

Nancy R. Pearcey, Total Truth: Liberating Christianity from its Cultural Captivity (Wheaton/Ill:

Wilhelm von Humboldt, The Limits of State Action [1792]. Chapter 3 available at http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/humboldt/wilhelm_von/sphere/chater3.html.

H.B. Acton, The Morals of Markets and Related Essays (edited by D Gordon and J Shearmur, Liberty

Hunnings (ed), Encyclopaedia of European Law (Sweet & Maxwell, 1998) s 12.0120A, cited in John Warwick Montgomery, í¢€ËœSubsidiarity as a Jurisprudential and Canonical Theoryí¢€â„¢ (2002) 148 Law and Justice The Christian Law Review 46, 48.

John Warwick Montgomery, í¢€ËœSubsidiarity as a Jurisprudential and Canonical Theoryí¢€â„¢ (2002) 148 Law and Justice: The Christian Law Review 46, 48.

Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. London: Burns & Oates, 2005, 94.

Augusto Zimmermann, í¢€ËœSubsidiarity, Democracy and Individual Liberty in Brazilí¢€â„¢, in Michelle Evans Augusto Zimmermann, Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity (Dordrecht: Springer, 2014) 88.